From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborn v. Cardeza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1917
177 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

March, 1917.


Order modified by striking out the 5th paragraph and inserting in lieu thereof the following: Ordered, that Charles Burstein be and hereby is appointed as receiver of the said judgment in this action to enforce and to carry into effect the said judgment as may be proper in adjustment of the rights of the parties and those of their respective attorneys, if any, thereunder, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., Not voting.


Summaries of

Osborn v. Cardeza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1917
177 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Osborn v. Cardeza

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN C. OSBORN, Respondent, v. HOWARD J.M. CARDEZA and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1917

Citations

177 App. Div. 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)