From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osband v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2015
2:97-CV-0152-KJM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, TIVON SCHARDL, Trial & Habeas Counsel, Sacramento, California, TIM BROSNAN, Mill Valley, CA, Attorneys for Petitioner LANCE IAN OSBAND.


          ORDER

          KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

         Petitioner seeks a twelfth extension of time for filing his reply to Respondent's answer brief regarding the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to claims I, V, IX and X. Pursuant to the court's order granting Petitioner's eleventh request the reply brief is due March 23, 2015. Petitioner's counsel cite a family crisis and work on other cases as grounds for failing to complete their work. Counsel state that they do not anticipate any further requests for time. Respondent does not oppose the request. The court, being fully informed in the matter, finds the request is supported by GOOD CAUSE and should be GRANTED.

         Petitioner shall file his reply brief no later than May 4, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Osband v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 25, 2015
2:97-CV-0152-KJM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Osband v. Warden, San Quentin State Prison

Case Details

Full title:LANCE IAN OSBAND, Petitioner, v. WARDEN of San Quentin State Prison…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

2:97-CV-0152-KJM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2015)