From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osage Oil Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 15, 1925
239 P. 581 (Okla. 1925)

Opinion

No. 16079

Opinion Filed September 15, 1925.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to Give Notice — Dismissal.

Where notice is not given of intention to appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worten, Judge.

Action between the Osage Oil Refining Company et al. and Interstate Pipe Company. From the judgment, the former bring error. Dismissed.

J.E. Whitehead, for plaintiffs in error.

Rowland Talbott, for defendant in error.


This is a motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, for the reason no notice was given of intention to appeal. An examination of the record shows that no notice was given. Section 782, C.O.S. 1921, is mandatory, and the appeal is dismissed. Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59, 234 P. 752; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 P. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 P. 211; Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 P. 867; Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25, 177 P. 566.


Summaries of

Osage Oil Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 15, 1925
239 P. 581 (Okla. 1925)
Case details for

Osage Oil Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

Case Details

Full title:OSAGE OIL REFINING CO. et al. v. INTERSTATE PIPE CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 15, 1925

Citations

239 P. 581 (Okla. 1925)
113 Okla. 114