From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 31, 2012
100 So. 3d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D11–3310.

2012-10-31

O.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Orlando Prescott, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Brian L. Ellison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Orlando Prescott, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Brian L. Ellison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS, C.J., and SHEPHERD and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We agree that O.S.'s adjudications for violating sections 893.13(6)(b) and 893.147(1) of the Florida Statutes (2011) must be affirmed. First, his argument that his adjudications for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia should be reversed, because a lack of a mens rea requirement in section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2011), renders the possession statutes unconstitutional, has recently been rejected by the Florida Supreme Court. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). Second, sufficient evidence was adduced at the adjudicatory hearing to support the adjudications at issue.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

O.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 31, 2012
100 So. 3d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

O.S. v. State

Case Details

Full title:O.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

100 So. 3d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)