From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orwig-Reihl v. Watson Pharms., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 24, 2012
Case No: 10-CV-8869 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 10-CV-8869 (LTS)(KNF)

05-24-2012

KATHRYN ORWIG-REIHL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Defendants,


Judge: Laura Taylor Swain


PARTIES JOINT PROPOSED ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate the Current Scheduling Order and Stay All Proceedings and Discovery, filed April 16,2012 [Doc. 49], and the Court having considered that Motion and Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, and Watson Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation's Response [Doc. 50], and otherwise being fully advised,

It is HEREBY ORDERED;

(1) The current scheduling order [Doc. 27] is hereby vacated;
(2) This case is stayed pending the decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation regarding the transfer of this case to MDL-2372; and
(3) While this case is stayed, the parties may (either by agreement or by petitioning the court) conduct discovery of third parties by authorization, or subpoena if necessary, in order to obtain medical records, pharmacy records, death investigation records, educational records, employment records, tax records, social security records, and insurance records that specifically pertain
to the decedents. Conducting such discovery by agreement is the preferred course and consent to do so shall not be unreasonably withheld or made contingent upon any other agreement. Further, it is understood and agreed that Defendants may continue to conduct discovery of third parties to obtain any and all records related to the decedents for which authorizations have already been provided by Plaintiffs.
(4) If the parties wish to conduct discovery other than that provided for in paragraph 3 above, they may petition this Court and, upon a showing of good cause, such discovery will be permitted.
(5) Nothing in this order shall prohibit the parties during the pendency of the stay from requesting and/or obtaining documents and tangible things regarding decedents that are publically available without authorization or subpoena.

SUBMITTED BY AND AGREED TO:

___________

Michael Heygood, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

michael@hop-law.com

David E. Pitcher, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

david@hop-law.com

James Craig Orr, Jr., Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

jim@hop-law.com

Eric D. Pearson, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

erk@hop-law.com

Charles W. Miller. Esq.

(Admittedpro hoc vice)

charJes@hop-iaw.com

Heygood, Orr & Pearson

2331 W. Northwest Highway, 2nd Floor

Dallas. TX 75220

(214)237-9001

(214) 237-9002 FAX

And

___________

Jose P. Thomas, Esq.

(Admitted pro hac vice)

jthotnas@ulmer.com

Jeffrey F. Peck, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

jpeck@ulmer.com

K.C. Green, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

kcgreen@uhner.com

Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

jgeoppinger@u lmcr.com

Kenneth R. Craycraft Jr., Esq.

(Admitted pro hoc vice)

kcraycrafl@ulmer.com

Ulmer & Berne LLP

600 Vine Street, Suite 2800

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Tel: 513.698.5000

Fax: 513.698.5001

Christopher R. LoPalo

Worby, Groner, Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP

350 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10118

(212) 267-3700

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Andrew J. Scholz, Esq. (RP 3906)

aschol2@goldbergsegalia.c0m

Goldberg Segalla, LLP

11 Marline Avenue, Suite 750

White Plains, NY 10606

Tel: 914.798.5400

Fax: 914.798.5401

Attorneys for Defendants Watson

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc.,

Watson Laboratories, Inc. a Delaware

corporation, and Watson Laboratories, Inc., a

Nevada corporation


Summaries of

Orwig-Reihl v. Watson Pharms., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 24, 2012
Case No: 10-CV-8869 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Orwig-Reihl v. Watson Pharms., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHRYN ORWIG-REIHL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

Case No: 10-CV-8869 (LTS)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2012)