From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 3, 2011
62 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5D10-2498.

June 3, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Timothy Shea, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Smith v. State, 59 So.3d 1107 (Fla. 2011), (juror's surname, without more, is insufficient to trigger inquiry as to whether strike was exercised for discriminatory reason); Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla. 2007) (preservation of challenge to potential juror requires more than one objection; when trial court denies or grants peremptory challenge, objecting party must renew and reserve objection before jury is sworn).

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 3, 2011
62 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Ortiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul Christopher ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 3, 2011

Citations

62 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)