Ortiz v. Reynolds

Full title: JOSE B.ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. J. REYNOLDS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

2:10-cv-1380-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

JOSE B.ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. J. REYNOLDS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-1380-MCE-EFB P United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 14, 2015

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, CHIEF JUDGE.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On November 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed November 7, 2014 (ECF No. 110), are ADOPTED in full; and

         2. Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 109) is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.