Opinion
2012-07-5
Diana Ortiz, New York City, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.
Diana Ortiz, New York City, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 1, 2011, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, an administrative assistant, was terminated for insubordination after she refused to cooperate with the employer's investigation of an earlier incident involving an angry dispute that claimant had with a tenant's employee. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her job due to misconduct. Claimant appeals and we affirm.
“An employee's failure to comply with an employer's reasonable request may constitute insubordination rising to the level of disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of Labor], 27 A.D.3d 866, 867, 810 N.Y.S.2d 557 [2006] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Setzer [Commissioner of Labor], 69 A.D.3d 1087, 893 N.Y.S.2d 344 [2010] ). Here, claimant admittedly refused repeated requests by the employer's director that she discuss the incident with him. Given the reasonableness of this request and the absence of a compelling reason for claimant's refusal ( see Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of Labor], 27 A.D.3d at 867, 810 N.Y.S.2d 557), we find no basis to reverse the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.