From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortega v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2017
No. 2:13-cv-01913-JKS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-01913-JKS

08-02-2017

VICTOR ANTHONY ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, High Desert State Prison, Respondent.


ORDER
[Re: Motion at Docket No. 46]

This Court denied Victor Anthony Ortega, a state prisoner now proceeding pro se, habeas relief on June 15, 2017. Docket Nos. 41, 42. The Court granted a certificate of appealability as to his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain forensic expert evidence. Id. Ortega timely filed a notice of appeal, dated June 23, 2017, which was processed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Nos. 43, 44. At Docket No. 46, Ortega now moves to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") on appeal.

Although Ortega's appeal is currently pending before the Ninth Circuit, "[t]he decision to allow an appeal to proceed in forma pauperis remains within the jurisdiction of the trial court after the filing of an appeal." Zambrano v. Gipson, No. LA CV 15-01794, 2016 WL 4040649, at *1 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2016) (citation omitted). A person may be granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis if the person "submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant's belief that the person is entitled to redress." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (stating that this provision applies to all actions filed in forma pauperis, not just prisoner actions). "'[T]he supporting affidavits [must] state the facts as to [the] affiant's poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.'" United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) (quoting Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 823, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)).

In support of his application, Ortega submits a declaration and account statement indicating that he has no assets or income. Ortega is thus within the parameters necessary to grant an IFP application. Accordingly, his application to proceed on appeal without the payment of a filing fee is granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis at Docket No. 46 is GRANTED.

Dated: August 2, 2017.

/s/James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ortega v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2017
No. 2:13-cv-01913-JKS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Ortega v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR ANTHONY ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, High…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2017

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-01913-JKS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2017)