From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortega v. Al Christensen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 3, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0316 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0316 JAM CKD P

06-03-2013

RICHARD ORTEGA, Plaintiff, v. AL CHRISTENSEN, et. al, Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Two recent court orders were served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ortega v. Al Christensen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 3, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0316 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Ortega v. Al Christensen

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ORTEGA, Plaintiff, v. AL CHRISTENSEN, et. al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0316 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2013)