From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orrand v. Barone Horizontal Directional Boring Company

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 4, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-0043 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-0043.

May 4, 2011


ORDER


After obtaining an entry of default, plaintiffs have moved for a default judgment for delinquent contributions, interest, and court costs in the total amount of $672.80. The proposed order submitted with the motion refers to an affidavit from Raymond Orrand, the administrator of the plaintiff funds, but no such affidavit has been filed. Further, it states that the affidavit indicates that the defendant did not permit an audit of the books and records of the defendant; however, the amended complaint states that an audit occurred on March 7, 2011, and that the sums allegedly due were determined based on that audit.

The failure to file a timely answer to a complaint is an admission of all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint which relate to liability, but it is not considered to be an admission of damages. See Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Claus, 2009 WL 243013, *4 (S.D. Ohio January 29, 2009). Ordinarily, a party requesting a default judgment must submit independent evidence of its damages. That has not occurred here. Consequently, the motion for default judgment (#8) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its renewal so long as any renewed motion is accompanied by satisfactory proof of damages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orrand v. Barone Horizontal Directional Boring Company

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 4, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-0043 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Orrand v. Barone Horizontal Directional Boring Company

Case Details

Full title:Raymond Orrand, Adminstrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barone Horizontal…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-0043 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2011)