From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orr v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-919 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-919

01-23-2013

JAMES ORR, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


Barrett, J.

Bowman, M.J.


ORDER

This pro se habeas corpus action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the court on petitioner's motion, in which petitioner requests the issuance of an order compelling the respondent to produce the "complete Trial Transcript, including the Victim[] Impact Statement of the alleged Victim, which was read into the Record." (Doc. 11). Respondent opposes petitioner's motion. (Doc. 12). In a separate Report and Recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has recommended that the petitioner's § 2254 petition be dismissed with prejudice because the petition is time-barred. Therefore, petitioner's motion to compel the production of the complete trial transcript (Doc. 11) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Stephanie K. Bowman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Orr v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-919 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Orr v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ORR, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-919 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)