From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orr v. California Highway Patrol

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2015
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          MICHAEL J. HADDAD, JULIA SHERWIN, GENEVIEVE K. GUERTIN, T. KENNEDY HELM, HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff HARRISON LUTHER ORR.

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, PETER A. MESHOT, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, STEPHEN C. PASS, Deputy Attorney General, Attorney for Defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPEARING BY AND THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, TERRY PLUMB AND JAY BRAME.


          STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SEALING OR LOCKING ECF 54-25

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         The parties in this case, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate, and request this Court to order, that Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) to the Declaration of T. Kennedy Helm in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 54) be sealed or locked. Plaintiff will replace the current Exhibit 26 with a new Exhibit 26 containing no confidential material. This joint request is based on the following:

1. Defendants inadvertently did not clearly designate the material comprising Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) as confidential pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order (ECF 30) until after Plaintiff had filed it as an exhibit and Plaintiff did not give notice beforehand to Defendants that it was filing ECF 54-25.

2. Defendant State of California, appearing by and through the Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP), greys out sections of the Highway Patrol Manual (HPM) to indicate material which it restricts from public disclosure because such disclosure could jeopardize officer safety.

3. Plaintiff's current Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) contains a substantial amount of greyed-out text in HPM 70.6, Chapter 2.

4. Defendants are concerned that the material in Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) should not be in the public domain for officer-safety reasons.

5. Plaintiff agrees to file a new Exhibit 26 which Defendants agree contains no confidential material that requires it to be sealed.

          ORDER

         This Court orders that Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) to the Declaration of T. Kennedy Helm in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 54) be sealed. Plaintiff will file a new Exhibit 26 to replace it that does not contain any material that Defendants consider confidential.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orr v. California Highway Patrol

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2015
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Orr v. California Highway Patrol

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON LUTHER ORR, Individually, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 9, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2015)