From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orphan v. Carol Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 3, 1990
161 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


In response to extensive interrogatories, the jury found that defendants had been negligent, and had defamed and falsely imprisoned the plaintiff, but that none of these acts "proximately caused" any injury to the plaintiff. In accordance with the instructions on the verdict sheet, the jury returned its verdict without considering the issue of punitive damages.

Plaintiff's failure to object to the form of the verdict sheet places beyond appellate review the arguments now raised on appeal as a matter of law, and we decline to exercise our discretion to review these matters.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Orphan v. Carol Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 3, 1990
161 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Orphan v. Carol Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOAN ORPHAN, Appellant, v. CAROL MANAGEMENT CORP. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 3, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

Mason ESC, LLC v. Michael Anthony Contracting Corp.

" ‘Pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4), a court has broad discretion in determining whether an action should be…

Yampolsky v. Tsaryuk

Thus, to obtain an accounting the plaintiff must, demonstrate "some wrongdoing on the. part of a defendant…