From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orozco v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-2585 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2: 12-cv-2585 KJM CKD

04-24-2013

MAGDALENA OROZCO, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Defendant has filed an ex parte application to vacate plaintiff's motion to compel, currently calendared for hearing on May 1, 2013. Upon review of the pending motion for summary judgment and in light of the April 12, 2013 order of the District Judge, it appears that a temporary stay of discovery is warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's ex parte application (ECF No. 38) is granted;

2. The May 1, 2013 hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 24) is vacated. The motion to compel is denied without prejudice to its renewal after resolution of the motion for summary judgment.

______________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Orozco v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2013
No. 2: 12-cv-2585 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Orozco v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAGDALENA OROZCO, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

No. 2: 12-cv-2585 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)