From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Rourke v. O'Rourke

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
May 21, 1951
52 So. 2d 606 (La. Ct. App. 1951)

Opinion

No. 19641.

May 21, 1951.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, NO. 277-019, DIVISION "A", PAUL E. CHASEZ, J.

Kullman Lang and Seme S. Klegar, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.

W. Blair Lancaster, Jr., and Prowell Viosca, New Orleans, for defendant and appellee Dr. C. Grenes Cole.


Dr. C. Grenes Cole, one of the defendants herein, has filed an application for a rehearing, wherein he contends that Act No. 303 of 1944 is unconstitutional. The plea of the unconstitutionality of the statute was neither raised in nor passed upon by the lower court, and under the well established jurisprudence the question of the constitutionality of a statute cannot be considered when raised for the first time in a reviewing court. See Causey v. Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co., Inc., 192 La. 677, 188 So. 739; Ricks v. Crowell Spencer Lumber Co., La. App., 189 So. 466; Southern Amusement Co. v. City of Jennings, 180 La. 800, 157 So. 720; Succession of Fachan, 179 La. 333, 154 So. 15; Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. Leon Boudreaux Bros., 153 La. 685, 96 So. 532; Saint v. Martel, 127 La. 73, 53 So. 432; State ex rel. People's Fire Ins. Co., v. Michel, 125 La. 55, 51 So. 66.

The other grounds urged for a rehearing need not be commented upon.

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Rehearing refused.


Summaries of

O'Rourke v. O'Rourke

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
May 21, 1951
52 So. 2d 606 (La. Ct. App. 1951)
Case details for

O'Rourke v. O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:O'ROURKE v. O'ROURKE et al

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans

Date published: May 21, 1951

Citations

52 So. 2d 606 (La. Ct. App. 1951)

Citing Cases

O'Rourke v. O'Rourke

An analysis by us of plaintiff's petition disclosed that it did manifest a cause and a right of action, thus…