From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orosco v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 18, 2019
No. 04-19-00366-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00366-CR

11-18-2019

April OROSCO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2017CR5505
Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On October 18, 2019, appellant's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and an amended brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal.

After reviewing counsel's motion to withdraw and brief, we conclude counsel has not fully complied with Kelly v. State because there is no indication counsel has informed his client of her pro se right to seek discretionary review should this court declare appellant's appeal frivolous. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant's counsel file a response indicating he has complied with the above Kelly requirements by December 2, 2019.

/s/_________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of November, 2019.

/s/_________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Orosco v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 18, 2019
No. 04-19-00366-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2019)
Case details for

Orosco v. State

Case Details

Full title:April OROSCO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Nov 18, 2019

Citations

No. 04-19-00366-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 18, 2019)