From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orosco v. Dilnik, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
CV 24-777 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-777 PA (SKx)

03-13-2024

Alvaro Orosco v. Dilnik, Inc., et al.


Present: The PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 20, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Orosco v. Dilnik, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
CV 24-777 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Orosco v. Dilnik, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Alvaro Orosco v. Dilnik, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

CV 24-777 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)