From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Rorke v. Carpenter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1986
125 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 11, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew R. Tyler, J.).


Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging libel and slander by defendant and in their complaint sought preliminary and permanent injunctive relief besides compensatory and punitive damages. Thereafter, in response to defendant's motion to strike the case from the Jury Calendar, the plaintiffs withdrew their prayer for injunctive relief.

In holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to a jury trial because of their withdrawal of the equitable claim, the court at nisi prius erred.

It has long been settled that the joinder of claims for legal and equitable relief results in a waiver of the right to a jury trial. (Panarella v. Penthouse Intl., 64 A.D.2d 545; CPLR 4102 [c].) Plaintiffs cannot revive this right by a subsequent "maneuver" to sever the equitable claim. (Kaplan v. Long Is. Univ., 116 A.D.2d 508, 509; Panarella v. Penthouse Intl., supra.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Carro, Asch and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

O'Rorke v. Carpenter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1986
125 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

O'Rorke v. Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. O'RORKE, JR., et al., Respondents, v. EDMUND S. CARPENTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Zimmer-Masiello, Inc. v. Zimmer, Inc.

When, as here, the complaint either joins legal and equitable causes of action arising out of the same…

New Media Holding Co. v. Kagalovsky

This argument has no merit. Because defendants' demand for the equitable remedy of rescission in Action 2 was…