Opinion
December 1, 1964.
Edward A. Brodeur for the plaintiff.
Robert V. Mulkern for the defendant.
Decree affirmed with costs to the defendant. A master was justified by his subsidiary findings in concluding in effect that De Mauro, with the plaintiff's consent, reasonably improved a way without excess excavation, damage to the plaintiff, or material interference with the road level near the plaintiff's buildings. Upon the basis of the confirmed master's report a final decree dismissing the bill (seeking principally restoration of removed soil) was properly entered.