From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 15, 2015
609 F. App'x 654 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2015-1056

07-15-2015

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee v. DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON, Sanctioned Parties-Appellants

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Boston, MA; WILLIAM M. JAY, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:02-cv-60478-WJZ, Judge William J. Zloch.

JUDGMENT

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Boston, MA; WILLIAM M. JAY, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 15, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 15, 2015
609 F. App'x 654 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

609 F. App'x 654 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Kozyrev v. Ponomarenko

Sanctions, however, must be "calibrated to the damages caused" by the bad faith conduct at issue. Goodyear,…