From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orange v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 27, 2012
No. 3:12-mc-0069 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-mc-0069

09-27-2012

CHARLES E. ORANGE Petitioner, v. ARVIL CHAPMAN, WARDEN Respondent.


GENERAL DOCKET


Judge Campbell


ORDER

The Court has before it a pro se prisoner petition (Docket Entry No.1) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, for writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner has neglected, however, to either pay the fee required for the filing of the petition or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, the petitioner is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk will provide the petitioner with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of Administrative Order No. 93.

The petitioner is forewarned that, should he fail to comply with these instructions within the specified period of time, the Court will presume that he is not interested in pursuing this matter and will dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.

It is so ORDERED.

________

Todd Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Orange v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 27, 2012
No. 3:12-mc-0069 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Orange v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. ORANGE Petitioner, v. ARVIL CHAPMAN, WARDEN Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-mc-0069 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 27, 2012)