From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orange N.W. Ry. v. Fairchilds

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Apr 6, 1920
220 S.W. 798 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 886.

April 6, 1920.

Error from District Court, Orange County; W. T. Davis, Judge.

Action by Ed Fairchilds against the Orange Northwestern Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. On motion for order directing clerk to file transcript and statement of facts. Motion denied.

Andrews, Streetman, Logue Mobley, of Houston, and Holland Holland, of Orange, for plaintiffs in error.

Smith Crawford, of Beaumont, and John Hancock, of Thurber, for defendant in error.


This is a motion filed in this court on February 25, 1920, praying for an order directing the clerk of this court to file a transcript and statement of facts. The motion is denied, and ordered dismissed for the reasons stated in disposing of motion No. 885, Orange Northwestern Railway Co. et al. v. Leroy Pruter, 220 S.W. 797, this day disposed of.


Summaries of

Orange N.W. Ry. v. Fairchilds

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Apr 6, 1920
220 S.W. 798 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)
Case details for

Orange N.W. Ry. v. Fairchilds

Case Details

Full title:ORANGE N.W. RY. CO. et al. v. FAIRCHILDS

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont

Date published: Apr 6, 1920

Citations

220 S.W. 798 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Citing Cases

Cameron County Irr. Dist. v. Bankers Trust

Even if, as contended by the appellant in the case cited, the full time of the new law, after it went into…