Opinion
91263
Decided and Entered: December 12, 2002.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered February 14, 2002 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely.
Jose Oquendo, Amsterdam, appellant pro se.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Dorothy E. Hill of counsel), for respondent.
Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On October 10, 2001, petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a decision of the Board of Parole revoking his parole release without a hearing. The record establishes that the Board's final decision was mailed to petitioner no later than January 17, 2001 and that he did not commence this proceeding until approximately nine months thereafter. Hence, the matter was properly dismissed for failure to comply with the applicable statute of limitations period requiring that all CPLR article 78 proceedings are to "be commenced within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding" (CPLR 217; see Matter of Carter v. State of New York, Exec. Dept., Div. of Parole, 95 N.Y.2d 267, 270; Matter of Parker v. Executive Dept., Bd. of Parole, 278 A.D.2d 767).
Even if this proceeding had been timely commenced, the judgment of dismissal would be affirmed. As petitioner was convicted of a felony while on parole release and was duly sentenced on that conviction, his parole was revoked by operation of law without the necessity of holding a parole revocation hearing (see Executive Law § 259-i [d] [iii];see also People ex rel. Harris v. Sullivan, 74 N.Y.2d 305, 308; People ex rel. Melendez v. Bennett, 291 A.D.2d 590, 591, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 602).
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.