From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Opsahl v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Nov 29, 2016
TC-MD 160252N (Or. T.C. Nov. 29, 2016)

Opinion

TC-MD 160252N

11-29-2016

JOSEPH OPSAHL and ZUZANA OPSAHL Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


FINAL DECISION

This Final Decision incorporates without change the court's Decision, entered November 9, 2016. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 16 C(1).

ALLISON R. BOOMER, MAGISTRATE

This matter came before the court on the agreement of the parties.

During the case management conference held July 28, 2016, Plaintiffs agreed to provide a letter from their employer to Defendant; Defendant agreed to file written recommendations; and Plaintiffs agreed to file a written response to Defendant's recommendations. The parties' agreement was memorialized in a Journal Entry, issued August 1, 2016. On September 23, 2016, Defendant filed written recommendations stating that, for the 2012 tax year, Plaintiffs should be allowed "$12, 266 of the $16, 311 in unreimbursed employee business expenses" claimed. On November 7, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a letter stating they "concede the remaining issues as outlined in ODR's Recommendation to the Court dated September 21, 2016."

Because the parties are in agreement, this matter is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that, for the 2012 tax year, Plaintiffs are allowed a deduction for $12, 266 of unreimbursed employee business expenses.


Summaries of

Opsahl v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Nov 29, 2016
TC-MD 160252N (Or. T.C. Nov. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Opsahl v. Department of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH OPSAHL and ZUZANA OPSAHL Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

TC-MD 160252N (Or. T.C. Nov. 29, 2016)