Opinion
8:21-cv-01842-JLS-DFM
05-03-2022
Opendoor Property Acquisition LLC v. Jeffrey Baum et al
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 7)
Before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by Opendoor Property Acquisition LLC. (Mot., Doc. 7.) Defendants did not oppose. The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument, and the hearing set for May 13, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion.
The deadline to oppose has passed, and Defendants have filed no opposition. “The failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion [.]” L.R. 7-12; see Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (“Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.”). Thus, Defendants' failure to oppose is, by itself, sufficient basis to grant the Motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. This action is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of California (County of Orange), Case No. 30-2021-01183985-CL-UD-CJC.