From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onwuka v. Andre

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 24, 2023
8:22-cv-00287-FWS-JC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

8:22-cv-00287-FWS-JC

03-24-2023

ANDY KEJADI ONWUKA, Petitioner, v. ROB ST. ANDRE, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE [16][28]

FRED W. SLAUGHTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the February 21, 2023, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [79] (“Report and Recommendation”). The Court notes that Petitioner has filed a Response to the Report and Recommendation [81] indicating that Petitioner agrees with and concedes to the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's Motion to Stay State Sentence and Release Pending Conclusion of Federal Habeas Corpus Petition [16] is denied.

2. Petitioner's Application to Stay and Abey Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus [28] is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Onwuka v. Andre

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 24, 2023
8:22-cv-00287-FWS-JC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Onwuka v. Andre

Case Details

Full title:ANDY KEJADI ONWUKA, Petitioner, v. ROB ST. ANDRE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

8:22-cv-00287-FWS-JC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

Citing Cases

Lehr v. Thornell

Thus, it would be inappropriate to grant a Rhines stay to enable a habeas petitioner to return to state court…