From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onstead v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Sep 12, 2019
No. 3:18-cv-222-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-222-DPM

09-12-2019

CHARLES LEE ONSTEAD; and EARNESTINE ONSTEAD PLAINTIFFS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.; DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.; DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.; and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS, Manufacturers, Distributors, Successor or Predecessor Companies, Subsidiaries, and Parent Entities DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

The Onsteads' complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

12 September 2019


Summaries of

Onstead v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Sep 12, 2019
No. 3:18-cv-222-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Onstead v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LEE ONSTEAD; and EARNESTINE ONSTEAD PLAINTIFFS v. JOHNSON …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 12, 2019

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-222-DPM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2019)

Citing Cases

Laumeier v. Laumeier

In re Gladys Morgan, 117 Mo. 265; Morrill v. Morrill, 83 Conn. 479; Van Fleet's Former Adjudication, p. 712;…

McElvain v. McElvain

However, the father would continue to be liable to others for the support of his children. Johnson v.…