From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onofre v. Higgins AG, LLC

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 14, 2022
8:21-cv-311-TPB-TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-cv-311-TPB-TGW

01-14-2022

ANTONIO ONOFRE, for himself and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HIGGINS AG, LLC, MARIANNE HIGGINS, and BRENT M. HIGGINS, individually, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TOM BARBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on December 29, 2021. (Doc. 17). Judge Wilson recommends that “Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against All Defendants” (Doc. 16) be granted, and that default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendants, in the total amount of $39,651.60, plus post-judgment interest calculated at the statutory rate. No. party has filed an objection, and the time to object has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).

Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Wilson's report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) Judge Wilson's report and recommendation (Doc. 17) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.

(2) “Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against All Defendants” (Doc. 16) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff is to be awarded damages totaling $39,651.60, plus post-judgment interest calculated at the statutory rate.

The damages consist of $15,515.50 in unpaid overtime wages, $684.80 in unpaid minimum wages, $16,200.30 in liquidated damages, $727.00 in costs, and $6,524.00 in attorney's fees.

(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter final default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Antonio Onofre, and against Defendants Higgins AG, LLC, Marianne Higgins and Brent M. Higgins, in accordance with this Order.

(4) After entering judgment, the Clerk is directed to terminate any deadlines and thereafter close this case.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Onofre v. Higgins AG, LLC

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 14, 2022
8:21-cv-311-TPB-TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Onofre v. Higgins AG, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO ONOFRE, for himself and on behalf of those similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 14, 2022

Citations

8:21-cv-311-TPB-TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2022)

Citing Cases

Sikorsky v. FCS Indus

Courts analyzing motions for default judgment employ this standard in reviewing a plaintiff's claimed…

Rosa v. SRG Ocoee, LLC

Courts analyzing motions for default judgment employ this standard in reviewing a plaintiff's claimed…