From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onkst v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 13, 2017
NO. 03-15-00795-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00795-CR

02-13-2017

Timothy Onkst, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CR-15-405373, THE HONORABLE MIKE DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). In connection with his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response to counsel's brief, appellant timely filed the form motion provided by counsel requesting pro se access to the appellate record with this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). This Court granted the motion and ordered the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant. It appears that only a copy of the clerk's record was provided to appellant; the reporter's record has yet to be provided.

We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the reporter's record was provided, on or before February 23, 2017. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on February 13, 2017. Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Onkst v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 13, 2017
NO. 03-15-00795-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Onkst v. State

Case Details

Full title:Timothy Onkst, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Feb 13, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-15-00795-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2017)