From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oneto v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1942
265 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 9, 1942.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order granting respondent's motion to set aside a verdict in favor of defendant and to place the cause upon the calendar for a new trial. Order reversed on the law and the facts, the motion to set aside the verdict denied, and verdict reinstated, with costs. The trial presented a dispute between the defendant and an allegedly disinterested eye witness for the respondent. The two versions of how the accident happened were in sharp conflict and were irreconcilable. The jury accepted the defendant's version, which was amply supported by evidence which the jury had the right to find was credible. The learned trial justice was without power to assume the jury's function and to decide where the truth lay. ( Lee v. City Brewing Corp., 279 N.Y. 380, 384; Scheuerman v. Knapp Coal Co., Inc., 238 App. Div. 874.) Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oneto v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1942
265 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Oneto v. Greenberg

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY ONETO, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, v. WILLIAM M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Dershwitz v. City of New York

In the light of the proof in the record on that issue, the setting aside of the verdicts would not have been…