From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neill v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 30, 2012
No. 105 MM 2012 (Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 105 MM 2012

08-30-2012

BRIAN JAMES O'NEILL, SUI JURIS PRIORITY CLAIMANT/INJURED PARTY, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL W. HARLOW SCI-ALBION SUPERINTENDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, ROBERT A. MULLE, ESQ., DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN M. MORGANELLI, ESQ., Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing, and Motion for Application for Relief are DENIED.


Summaries of

O'Neill v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 30, 2012
No. 105 MM 2012 (Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

O'Neill v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN JAMES O'NEILL, SUI JURIS PRIORITY CLAIMANT/INJURED PARTY, Petitioner…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

No. 105 MM 2012 (Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)