Opinion
Civil No. 05-2464 DSD/SRN Civil No. 06-2336 ADM/JSM Civil No. 07-2803 ADM/JSM Civil No. 07-3947 ADM/JSM Civil No. 07-4230 ADM/JSM Civil No. 10-2517 JRT/JJK
01-13-2012
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. Y.P.O. Fang, St. Paul Police Department, Autumn X. Nelson, City of St. Paul, MN, and Manuel Cervetes, Defendants. Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. Sheri Moore, Pete Crum, Y. Fang, Sgt. Graupmann, and City of St. Paul, Defendants. Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. Nina C. Cook, Radisson Hotel, City of St. Paul, Manuel Cervantes, John J.Choi, Yileng Vang, Capital City Properties, St. Paul Port Authority Prpty., Unknown Manager, Unknown Security Person, Shari Moore, Crestline Hotel Mgmt. and Carlson, Defendants. Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. City of St. Paul, Yileng Vang, Ramsey County, Susan Gaertner, Ms. Patricia Leski, Mr. Bob Fletcher, Mr. Greg Slatter, and Unknown Ramsey Dpty. Sheriff, Defendants. Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. City of St. Paul, Manuel Cervantes, Teresa Skarda, Andrea Miller, George T. Stephenson, John J. Choi, Jessical McConnelly, Ramsey County, Mr. Gill, Autumn X. Nelson, and Unknown Student Attorney, Defendants. Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. LDC Collect Systems, Minnesota 2nd Judicial District Court Administrator, Unknown Ramsey 2nd Judicial District Clerk, Karen Mareck, State of Minnesota, SDC Collection Systems, J.D.B. and Ramsey District Court Administrator, Defendants.
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, pro se.
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal, pro se.
This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge for consideration of Plaintiff Wendell Dwayne O'Neal's ("O'Neal") "Leave to File Amended Rules 72.2 Objections Motion" [Docket No. 347]. United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron's December 20, 2011 Order [Docket No. 346] denied O'Neal's motions to begin new litigation or re-open terminated cases in this Court concerning an incident which occurred on August 15, 2005.
All docket numbers referenced herein refer to filings in Civ. No. 06-2336.
Upon review of the files in this case, the Court finds that O'Neal's proposed "Amended Rules 72.2 Objections" [Docket No. 348] are precluded on the basis of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), res judicata, and collateral estoppel from re-litigating the extensively litigated events of August 15, 2005. Careful review of the pleadings confirm that O'Neal's Objections concern the same facts and legal theories and are without merit. Accordingly, O'Neal's request for leave to file is denied.
Based upon the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that O'Neal's "Leave to File Amended Rules 72.2 Objections Motion" [Docket No. 347] is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
______________________
ANN D. MONTGOMERY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE