From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Omosule v. United Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv00021 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cv00021.

February 21, 2006


DECISION AND ENTRY


The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #3), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 27, 2006 (Doc. #3) is ADOPTED in full.

2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, an appeal by Plaintiff would not be taken in good faith, and therefore leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals.
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Omosule v. United Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv00021 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Omosule v. United Airlines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OLUWADAYISI OMOSULE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06cv00021 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2006)