From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Omosule v. Hurley

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 9, 2009
Case Nos. 3:09cv00261 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2009)

Opinion

Case Nos. 3:09cv00261.

September 9, 2009


DECISION AND ENTRY


The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #3), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on August 19, 2009 (Doc. #3) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice;
3. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Decision and Entry would not be taken in good faith, and consequently leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is denied; and
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Omosule v. Hurley

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 9, 2009
Case Nos. 3:09cv00261 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Omosule v. Hurley

Case Details

Full title:OLUWADAYISI OMOSULE, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE STEPHEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Sep 9, 2009

Citations

Case Nos. 3:09cv00261 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2009)