From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olynyk v. Andrish

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 21, 2006
849 N.E.2d 1029 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-0235.

June 21, 2006.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration.


RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed January 9, 2006:

"Whether the double dismissal rule contained in Rule 41(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure applies to plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of claims pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Van Beusecum v. Continental Builders, Delaware App. No. 04-CAE-01-008, 2004-Ohio-7261.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0310, Olynyk v. Andrish, Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632.


Summaries of

Olynyk v. Andrish

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 21, 2006
849 N.E.2d 1029 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

Olynyk v. Andrish

Case Details

Full title:Olynyk v. Andrish

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 21, 2006

Citations

849 N.E.2d 1029 (Ohio 2006)
849 N.E.2d 1029
2006 Ohio 2998