From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olvera v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00540-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00540-AWI-GSA

03-19-2013

ARMANDO OLVERA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, and MARK ULRICH, Defendants.

Sanjay S. Schmidt (SB# 247475) LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Tai C. Bogan (SB# 241784) LAW OFFICE OF TAI C. BOGAN Attorneys for Plaintiff Armando Olvera SUSANA ALCALA WOOD City Attorney (SBN 156366) JAMES F. WILSON Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 107289) City of Modesto Attorneys for Defendants


Sanjay S. Schmidt (SB# 247475)
LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
Tai C. Bogan (SB# 241784)
LAW OFFICE OF TAI C. BOGAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff Armando Olvera SUSANA ALCALA WOOD
City Attorney (SBN 156366)
JAMES F. WILSON
Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 107289)
City of Modesto
Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATED REQUEST TO RE-SET

HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGEMENT AND ORDER


Date: April 15, 2013

Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

The parties hereby respectfully stipulate as follows:

A. This matter has been set for a hearing on Defendants' motion, which was filed on March 8, 2013 and styled as Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or, In the Alternative Partial Judgment.
B. The hearing on Defendants' motion was set for April 15, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.; however, the office of counsel for Defendants inadvertently set this date prior to confirming the availability of counsel for Plaintiff. Unfortunately, counsel for Plaintiff is unavailable on April 15, 2013 because counsel must appear for a hearing on a different matter in a different county.

WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE and respectfully request that the Court vacate the April 15, 2013 hearing date and re-set the hearing on Defendants' motion to April 29, 2013, at 1:30, in D-2, before the Hon. Anthony W. Ishii.

Plaintiff attests that all signatories below concur in the filing of this document.

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

LAW OFFICE OF TAI C. BOGAN

BY: Sanjay S. Schmidt

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MODESTO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

BY: James F. Wilson

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Having considered the parties' stipulation, requesting that the hearing on Defendants' pending motion be vacated and re-set, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing currently set to be held on April 15, 2013, at 1:30, in D-2, on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or, In the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment, is hereby vacated; the hearing is re-set to April 29, 2013, at 1:30, in D-2, before the Hon. Anthony W. Ishii. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Olvera v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00540-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Olvera v. City of Modesto

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO OLVERA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00540-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)