From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olson v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 18, 2023
88 F.4th 781 (9th Cir. 2023)

Opinion

No. 21-55757

12-18-2023

Lydia OLSON; Miguel Perez; Postmates, Inc., (Successor Postmates LLC); Uber Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of California; Rob Bonta, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees.


D.C. No. 2:19-cv-10956-DMG-RAO Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER :

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.


Summaries of

Olson v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 18, 2023
88 F.4th 781 (9th Cir. 2023)
Case details for

Olson v. California

Case Details

Full title:LYDIA OLSON; MIGUEL PEREZ; POSTMATES, INC., (Successor Postmates LLC)…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 2023

Citations

88 F.4th 781 (9th Cir. 2023)

Citing Cases

Olson v. California

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, we granted rehearing en banc and vacated the…