From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olson v. Bank of Am.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct 23, 2012
383 S.W.3d 66 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97711.

2012-10-23

Stefanie OLSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Claimant/Appellant. Bank of America, NA, Acting Pro Se, c/o Ernst and Young, LLP Dallas, TX.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Claimant/Appellant. Bank of America, NA, Acting Pro Se, c/o Ernst and Young, LLP Dallas, TX.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Stefanie Olson appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision finding that she was disqualified from unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandumsetting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Olson v. Bank of Am.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct 23, 2012
383 S.W.3d 66 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Olson v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Stefanie OLSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

383 S.W.3d 66 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)