From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olsen v. St. Margaret of Scotland R.C. Church

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1966
222 N.E.2d 740 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued October 19, 1966

Decided November 22, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, D. ORMONDE RITCHIE, J.

William F. McNulty and Patrick F. Adams for appellant.

Benjamin H. Siff for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of defendant. The mere fact that a rug is not nailed to a waxed floor or placed on a rubber or other nonskid mat does not, in my view, create a question of fact for a jury.


Summaries of

Olsen v. St. Margaret of Scotland R.C. Church

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1966
222 N.E.2d 740 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Olsen v. St. Margaret of Scotland R.C. Church

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE F. OLSEN et al., Respondents, v. ST. MARGARET OF SCOTLAND ROMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1966

Citations

222 N.E.2d 740 (N.Y. 1966)
222 N.E.2d 740
276 N.Y.S.2d 122

Citing Cases

Mannix v. Matthews

Q. What happened to the rug when you stepped on it? A. Well, it must have slid." The case of Olsen v. St.…

Portanova v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates

His testimony also indicated that, although Dundee and its successor in interest manufactured approximately…