From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver Williams, Inc., v. Nielsen

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 13, 1954
206 Misc. 172 (N.Y. App. Term 1954)

Opinion

May 13, 1954.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, RAIMO, J.

Bruce E. Grunden and Walter D. Wile for appellant.

Lyman Stansky for respondent.


The undisputed facts are that buyer and seller merely agreed as to price and down payment in this real estate transaction, but the amount, interest and amortization rate, and term of the mortgages covering the balance thereof were not even discussed at the time of defendant's repudiation. Plaintiff may not recover agreed brokerage commissions on the theory of performance of its contract, in view of such essential terms of the sale having been left for future negotiation by the parties. There was no such meeting of the minds on all the necessary terms as is required to constitute a sale consummated by the broker's efforts. Accordingly the complaint should have been dismissed.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and complaint dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and EDER, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Oliver Williams, Inc., v. Nielsen

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 13, 1954
206 Misc. 172 (N.Y. App. Term 1954)
Case details for

Oliver Williams, Inc., v. Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER WILLIAMS, INC., Respondent, v. JOHN P. NIELSEN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 13, 1954

Citations

206 Misc. 172 (N.Y. App. Term 1954)
131 N.Y.S.2d 773