Oliver v. Smalls

Full title: ANTHONY WAYNE OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. D. SMALLS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 10, 2011

ED CV 10-0054 TJH (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)

Opinion

ANTHONY WAYNE OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. D. SMALLS, et al., Defendants. No. ED CV 10-0054 TJH (JCG) United States District Court, C.D. California. January 10, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          TERRY J. HATTER Jr., District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

         Plaintiff's Objections generally parrot and rehash the arguments made in his Opposition to the "Motion for Order Revoking Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status, " and lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties.