From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Feb 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 1:11-CV-01789 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 1:11-CV-01789

02-17-2012

OSWIN g. OLIVER, Petitioner v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Respondent


JUDGE , JR

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK

JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge previously filed herein, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law.

Additionally, the Court notes the copy of the report and recommendation mailed December 21, 2011 to Mr. Oliver's last known address was returned to the Clerk of Court on January 03, 2012, marked "return to sender". More than thirty days have passed since January 03, 2012, but no correction to Plaintiff's address has been received by the Court. Therefore, dismissal for failure to prosecute under Local Rule 41.3W and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is also appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

SIGNED on this _____ day of February, 2012, at Alexandria, Louisiana.

_____________________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE , JR

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Oliver v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Feb 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 1:11-CV-01789 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Oliver v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:OSWIN g. OLIVER, Petitioner v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 17, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 1:11-CV-01789 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, 2012)