Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO: 14-0482 SECTION: "I" (4)
07-08-2015
CLEBER DESOUZA OLIVEIRA v. IONIA MARIA MARTINS, ET AL.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Plaintiff, Cleber Oliviera's Second Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (R. Doc. 47), which was referred to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge to issue a report and recommendation. On July 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Withdraw Second Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (R. Doc. 50), notifying the Court that the underlying motion is now moot because the Defendants electronically transmitted the signed settlement documents.
Accordingly,
IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Second Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (R. Doc. 50) be GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Second Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (R. Doc. 34) be DENIED AS MOOT.
A party's failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in a magistrate judge's report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, provided that the party has been served with notice that such consequences will result from a failure to object. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996).
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 8th day of July 2015.
/s/ _________
KAREN WELLS ROBY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Douglass referenced the previously applicable ten-day period for the filing of objections. Effective December 1, 2009, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) was amended to extend the period to fourteen days.