From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olivas v. Nevada ex rel. Dept. of Corrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cv-01801-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-01801-JCM-VCF

08-14-2017

DARIO OLIVAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS; NICHOLAS GALBISO, individually; et al., Defendants.

ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General BENJAMIN R. JOHNSON, Bar No. 10632 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Bureau of Litigation Public Safety Division 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1254 E-mail: bjohnson@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Nevada Department of Corrections and Nicholas Galbiso


ADAM PAUL LAXALT

Attorney General
BENJAMIN R. JOHNSON, Bar No. 10632

Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: (775) 684-1254
E-mail: bjohnson@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants
Nevada Department of Corrections
and Nicholas Galbiso

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST]

Defendants, the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) and Nicholas Galbiso, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Benjamin Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, hereby move this Court for a seven day extension to file their answer or other first responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 29). The instant Motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, the following memorandum of points and authorities and all other papers and pleadings on file herein.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Dario Olivas filed a Motion to Amend Complaint on July 14, 2017. (ECF No. 26). Defendants filed a non-opposition on July 21, 2017. (ECF No. 27). The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 28), and the Third Amended Complaint was filed on July 26, 2017. (ECF No. 29). Defendants' responsive pleading is due on August 9, 2017.

II. ARGUMENT

A. Good Cause Exists to Grant an Enlargement of Time.

FRCP 6(b) addresses extending time, stating:

(1) In General.

When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time:

(A) with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or

(B) on motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.

Good cause exists to enlarge the time by which a party may file a brief where additional time is needed to prepare such a brief. See O'Connor v. U.S. I.R.S., 698 F.Supp. 204, 205 (D. Nev. 1988) (district court granted the plaintiffs' motion for an extension of time to oppose a motion for summary judgment).

Defendants seek a seven day enlargement of time, up to and including August 16, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint. Counsel for Defendants has been preoccupied with trial preparation in another case pending in the U.S. District Court of Nevada, Pinder v. Baker, 3:13-cv-00572-MMD-WGC, whose trial was set to begin on August 8, 2017. The parties had reached a tentative settlement, but there have been some problems finalizing the paperwork. Due to this unforeseen event, counsel has had to focus all attention on this other case.

Accordingly, Defendants request an enlargement of time to file a response. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay or to prejudice the Plaintiff. A short extension of time will allow Defendants to finalize a responsive pleading. /// /// /// ///

III. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, Defendants respectfully request that the Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response to Third Amended Complaint be GRANTED.

DATED this 9th day of August, 2017.

ADAM PAUL LAXALT

Attorney General

By: /s/_________

BENJAMIN R. JOHNSON

Deputy Attorney General

State of Nevada

Bureau of Litigation

Public Safety Division

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 14th day of August, 2017.

/s/_________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada, and that on August 9, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing, DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST], with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, District of Nevada, by using the CM/ECF system. Participants in this case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system: Cal J. Potter, III, Esq.
C.J. Potter, IV, Esq.
Potter Law Offices
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Attorneys for the Plaintiff

/s/_________

An employee of the

Office of the Attorney General


Summaries of

Olivas v. Nevada ex rel. Dept. of Corrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cv-01801-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Olivas v. Nevada ex rel. Dept. of Corrs.

Case Details

Full title:DARIO OLIVAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 14, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-01801-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2017)