Opinion
Submitted February 13, 1931 —
Decided October 19, 1931.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 744.
For the respondent, Egan Armstrong.
For the appellant, Heine Laird.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.