From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olenick v. Standard Oil Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
154 A. 629 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 1931 —

Decided October 19, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 744.

For the respondent, Egan Armstrong.

For the appellant, Heine Laird.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Olenick v. Standard Oil Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
154 A. 629 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Olenick v. Standard Oil Company

Case Details

Full title:JOHN OLENICK, RESPONDENT, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1931

Citations

154 A. 629 (N.J. 1931)
108 N.J.L. 201

Citing Cases

Ellis v. Dowd

Cf. Habedank v. Atlantic Casualty InsuranceCo., 128 N.J.L. 338, 340; 25 Atl. Rep. (2 d) 889. Rather do we…