Opinion
Eq. No. 2740; M. P. No. 1259.
July 1, 1959, Decided
Worrell & Hodge, Eldridge H. Henning, Jr., Providence, for petitioner.
Tillinghast, Collins & Tanner, Thomas R. Wickersham, Providence, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
After our decision in the above cases the respondent asked and received permission to file a motion for reargument. Pursuant to this permission it has filed such a motion, setting out therein certain reasons on which it bases its contention that justice requires a reargument of the case Equity No. 2740.
We have carefully considered those reasons and we are of the opinion that they are without merit.
Motion denied.