From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Laughlin v. FMC

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 14, 2021
20-CV-2641 (SRN/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-2641 (SRN/LIB)

06-14-2021

Timothy P. O'Laughlin, Plaintiff, v. FMC and Dr. Dionne Hart, Psychiatrist, Defendants.

Timothy P. O'Laughlin, Plaintiff pro se.


Timothy P. O'Laughlin,

Plaintiff pro se.

ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal of plaintiff Timothy P. O'Laughlin. See Doc. No. 20. The Court has reviewed the IFP application and concludes that O'Laughlin qualifies financially to proceed IFP. Moreover, the Court cannot say that this appeal is taken in the absence of good faith or is frivolous in the sense that the Supreme Court has defined that term. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Accordingly, the IFP application will be granted.

Based on the submissions and the entire file and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal of plaintiff Timothy P. O'Laughlin [Doc. No. 20] is GRANTED.


Summaries of

O'Laughlin v. FMC

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 14, 2021
20-CV-2641 (SRN/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

O'Laughlin v. FMC

Case Details

Full title:Timothy P. O'Laughlin, Plaintiff, v. FMC and Dr. Dionne Hart…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

20-CV-2641 (SRN/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2021)