Summary
In O'Keeffe v. Dugan (supra), an action to restrain a town clerk from submitting to the electors at the town meeting the question of local option, it appeared that signatures of electors signing the petition were proved by subscribing witnesses, although section 13 of the Liquor Tax Law required that the petition should be signed and acknowledged by the electors before a notary public.
Summary of this case from Maul v. MaulOpinion
Argued January 6, 1919
Decided January 21, 1919
Percy L. Housel for appellant.
Harry D. Sanders and Robert P. Griffing for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: HOGAN, J.