From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oien v. County of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 8, 2015
EDCV 14-01895 SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          Risa S. Christensen, Esq., Dennis E. Wagner, Esq., WAGNER & PELAYES, LLP, Riverside, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; SHERIFF JOHN McMAHON; DEPUTY JASON HENDRIX; DEPUTY HECTOR TOBAR; DEPUTY JULIUS McCHRISTIAN; and CITY OF CHINO HILLS.


          FINAL JUDGMENT

          STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.

         Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; SHERIFF JOHN McMAHON; DEPUTY JASON HENDRIX; DEPUTY HECTOR TOBAR; DEPUTY JULIUS McCHRISTIAN; and CITY OF CHINO HILLS, motion for summary judgment was set for a hearing on March 2, 2015. Additionally, plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment on limited claims for hearing on the same date. The court, after considering all documents filed on behalf of the defendants and on behalf of the plaintiffs and all oppositions, evidence, and replies, if any, vacated the hearing date and took all the matters under submission without oral argument. After review and consideration of all documents referenced and for good cause...

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of all defendants and against all plaintiffs on the federal claims which are set forth in plaintiffs' complaint in the Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth and Thirteenth Causes of Action. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and dismisses the remaining state law claims which comprise the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Causes of Action.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court denies plaintiffs' request for a continuance under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(d) and therefore further denies as moot all remaining issues raised in the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. This court incorporates the factual and legal findings to support this judgment in its Order of Ruling, Document 42, filed March 2, 2015.

         IT IS FURTHER, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants shall be entitled to their statutory costs as allowable by law.


Summaries of

Oien v. County of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 8, 2015
EDCV 14-01895 SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Oien v. County of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:CARISSA OIEN, individually, and as heir, survivor, and…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

EDCV 14-01895 SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)